UPDATE    zeta_targetnu_sh_comp
  <--->  Enter fixed drag force from  zeta_backwards_shc.xlsx, which is an averaged fixed value based on many tests
  10-28-19, we changed ca% to equal  (ca force / c force) = 15%.  Below we have ca force / (c force + ca force) = 13%.  But they are both basically the same.
 

7-11-21, we changed everything to ca% = 15% for id 14, but not the others

Record count  7         co wogas
c-zeta
c force
c-zeta
ca force
c-zeta
co wogas c force ca force ca% curve gas force drag force ca% calc
id
24
description
took id 17 and 19 and created 5 incremental targets, replacing 17 & 19
spring
4.55
mWheel
85
lev ratio
2.515
from test
3694 Bert Reynolds
target curve name
90_68_38_g
 
application
16 flsprs, 18 shaft, mx18-psh, 10yzf450-psh
 
quick summary comments
1 of 5 increm targ
 
8-23-22 We took id17 (3075) and id19 (3694) and created 4 new incremental targets.
a) id17 (3075) target curve was good, but we had to multiply x 1.27 go get it to align with id19 (3694).
b) We took id17, multiplied cforce by 1.27 and created id22 target, soft.
c) We took id19, changed cforce at 1ips from 32 to 34 and created id21 target, stiff.
d) Then we added those together and divided by 2 to get id22 target, middle.
e) Then we created the 4th stiffer yet target.
f) Then created a softer one.
For drag force we averaged 30 recent dyno tests with LDPB. This drag was used to create c-zeta numbers.
We used actual dynamic gas force for phm bladder kit, i.e. 75
mx18-psh with ressy pist, gas force = 69c, 73d with 16 flsprs
mx18-psh with bladder kit, gas force = 71c, 75d with 16 flsprs
10yzf450-psh with bladder, gas force = 73c, 77d with 16 flsprs
This curve is based on 'prel ring ls' for s50oval
See vdb / excel / zeta_backwards_shc.xlsx for details
Bert says this shock works very well.
.. 
1 0.9029 0.6242 0.0131 34 23.5 0.49 0.021 75 6 2.1 %
2 0.8301 0.6383 0.0191 62.5 48.1 1.44 0.03 75 9 3 %
3 0.765 0.6102 0.0238 86.4 68.9 2.69 0.039 75 10.8 3.9 %
4 0.7151 0.5807 0.0281 107.7 87.5 4.24 0.0485 75 12 4.8 %
5 0.6783 0.5582 0.0324 127.7 105.1 6.1 0.058 75 12.5 5.8 %
10 0.5741 0.4777 0.0497 216.2 179.9 18.7 0.104 75 13.6 10.4 %
20 0.4877 0.4026 0.0604 367.3 303.2 45.5 0.15 75 14.6 15 %
30 0.4351 0.3637 0.0546 491.6 410.8 61.64 0.15 75 15.1 15 %
40 0.4018 0.3376 0.0506 605.3 508.5 76.25 0.15 76 15.5 15 %
50 0.3794 0.3198 0.048 714.3 602.2 90.3 0.15 77 15.8 15 %
      [EDIT]                      
 
Record count  7         co wogas
c-zeta
c force
c-zeta
ca force
c-zeta
co wogas c force ca force ca% curve gas force drag force ca% calc
id
23
description
took id 17 and 19 and created 5 incremental targets, replacing 17 & 19
spring
4.55
mWheel
85
lev ratio
2.515
from test
3694 Bert Reynolds
target curve name
100_71_38_g
 
application
16 flsprs, 18 shaft, mx18-psh, 10yzf450-psh
 
quick summary comments
2 of 5 increm targ
 
8-23-22 We took id17 (3075) and id19 (3694) and created 4 new incremental targets.
a) id17 (3075) target curve was good, but we had to multiply x 1.27 go get it to align with id19 (3694).
b) We took id17, multiplied cforce by 1.27 and created id22 target, soft.
c) We took id19, changed cforce at 1ips from 32 to 34 and created id21 target, stiff.
d) Then we added those together and divided by 2 to get id22 target, middle.
e) Then we created the 4th stiffer yet target.
f) Then created a softer one.
For drag force we averaged 30 recent dyno tests with LDPB. This drag was used to create c-zeta numbers.
We used actual dynamic gas force for phm bladder kit, i.e. 75
mx18-psh with ressy pist, gas force = 69c, 73d with 16 flsprs
mx18-psh with bladder kit, gas force = 71c, 75d with 16 flsprs
10yzf450-psh with bladder, gas force = 73c, 77d with 16 flsprs
This curve is based on 'prel ring ls' for s50oval
See vdb / excel / zeta_backwards_shc.xlsx for details
Bert says this shock works very well.
.. 
1 0.9976 0.717 0.0151 37.6 27 0.57 0.021 75 6 2.1 %
2 0.9097 0.7156 0.0214 68.5 53.9 1.62 0.03 75 9 3 %
3 0.8245 0.6674 0.026 93.1 75.4 2.94 0.039 75 10.8 3.9 %
4 0.7571 0.6207 0.0301 114 93.5 4.54 0.0485 75 12 4.9 %
5 0.7069 0.5853 0.034 133.1 110.2 6.4 0.058 75 12.5 5.8 %
10 0.5809 0.4838 0.0503 218.7 182.2 18.95 0.104 75 13.6 10.4 %
20 0.4901 0.4047 0.0607 369.1 304.8 45.73 0.15 75 14.6 15 %
30 0.4357 0.3641 0.0546 492.2 411.4 61.7 0.15 75 15.1 15 %
40 0.4017 0.3375 0.0506 605.1 508.3 76.25 0.15 76 15.5 15 %
50 0.3793 0.3198 0.048 714.2 602.1 90.3 0.15 77 15.8 15 %
      [EDIT]                      
 
Record count  7         co wogas
c-zeta
c force
c-zeta
ca force
c-zeta
co wogas c force ca force ca% curve gas force drag force ca% calc
id
22
description
took id 17 and 19 and created 5 incremental targets, replacing 17 & 19
spring
4.55
mWheel
85
lev ratio
2.515
from test
3694 Bert Reynolds
target curve name
109_74_38_g
 
application
16 flsprs, 18 shaft, mx18-psh, 10yzf450-psh
 
quick summary comments
3 of 5 increm targ
Use 109 as default, or was it 119?
 
8-23-22 We took id17 (3075) and id19 (3694) and created 4 new incremental targets.
a) id17 (3075) target curve was good, but we had to multiply x 1.27 go get it to align with id19 (3694).
b) We took id17, multiplied cforce by 1.27 and created id22 target, soft.
c) We took id19, changed cforce at 1ips from 32 to 34 and created id21 target, stiff.
d) Then we added those together and divided by 2 to get id22 target, middle.
e) Then we created the 4th stiffer yet target.
f) Then created a softer one.
For drag force we averaged 30 recent dyno tests with LDPB. This drag was used to create c-zeta numbers.
We used actual dynamic gas force for phm bladder kit, i.e. 75
mx18-psh with ressy pist, gas force = 69c, 73d with 16 flsprs
mx18-psh with bladder kit, gas force = 71c, 75d with 16 flsprs
10yzf450-psh with bladder, gas force = 73c, 77d with 16 flsprs
This curve is based on 'prel ring ls' for s50oval
See vdb / excel / zeta_backwards_shc.xlsx for details
Bert says this shock works very well.
.. 
1 1.0922 0.8096 0.017 41.1 30.5 0.64 0.021 75 6 2.1 %
2 0.9897 0.7932 0.0238 74.5 59.7 1.8 0.03 75 9 3 %
3 0.8841 0.7248 0.0283 99.9 81.9 3.2 0.039 75 10.8 3.9 %
4 0.7991 0.6608 0.0321 120.4 99.5 4.83 0.0485 75 12 4.9 %
5 0.7357 0.6126 0.0355 138.5 115.3 6.69 0.058 75 12.5 5.8 %
10 0.5878 0.4901 0.051 221.3 184.5 19.2 0.104 75 13.6 10.4 %
20 0.4926 0.4068 0.061 371 306.4 45.95 0.15 75 14.6 15 %
30 0.4362 0.3646 0.0547 492.8 411.9 91.8 0.15 75 15.1 22.3 %
40 0.4015 0.3373 0.0506 604.8 508.1 76.2 0.15 76 15.5 15 %
50 0.3793 0.3197 0.048 714.1 602 90.3 0.15 77 15.8 15 %
      [EDIT]                      
 
Record count  7         co wogas
c-zeta
c force
c-zeta
ca force
c-zeta
co wogas c force ca force ca% curve gas force drag force ca% calc
id
21
description
took id 17 and 19 and created 5 incremental targets, replacing 17 & 19
spring
4.55
mWheel
85
lev ratio
2.515
from test
3694 Bert Reynolds
target curve name
119_76_38_g
 
application
16 flsprs, 18 shaft, mx18-psh, 10yzf450-psh
 
quick summary comments
4 of 5 increm targ
 
8-23-22 We took id17 (3075) and id19 (3694) and created 4 new incremental targets.
a) id17 (3075) target curve was good, but we had to multiply x 1.27 go get it to align with id19 (3694).
b) We took id17, multiplied cforce by 1.27 and created id22 target, soft.
c) We took id19, changed cforce at 1ips from 32 to 34 and created id21 target, stiff.
d) Then we added those together and divided by 2 to get id22 target, middle.
e) Then we created the 4th stiffer yet target.
f) Then created a softer one.
For drag force we averaged 30 recent dyno tests with LDPB. This drag was used to create c-zeta numbers.
We used actual dynamic gas force for phm bladder kit, i.e. 75
mx18-psh with ressy pist, gas force = 69c, 73d with 16 flsprs
mx18-psh with bladder kit, gas force = 71c, 75d with 16 flsprs
10yzf450-psh with bladder, gas force = 73c, 77d with 16 flsprs
This curve is based on 'prel ring ls' for s50oval
See vdb / excel / zeta_backwards_shc.xlsx for details
Bert says this shock works very well.
.. 
1 1.1869 0.9023 0.019 44.7 34 0.72 0.021 75 6 2.1 %
2 1.0695 0.8708 0.0261 80.6 65.6 1.97 0.03 75 9 3 %
3 0.9438 0.7822 0.0305 106.6 88.4 3.45 0.039 75 10.8 3.9 %
4 0.8412 0.7009 0.034 126.7 105.6 5.12 0.0485 75 12 4.8 %
5 0.7646 0.6399 0.0371 144 120.5 6.99 0.058 75 12.5 5.8 %
10 0.5945 0.4962 0.0516 223.9 186.8 19.44 0.104 75 13.6 10.4 %
20 0.4949 0.4089 0.0613 372.7 307.9 46.2 0.15 75 14.6 15 %
30 0.4367 0.3651 0.0547 493.4 412.4 61.85 0.15 75 15.1 15 %
40 0.4014 0.3372 0.0506 604.6 507.9 76.2 0.15 76 15.5 15 %
50 0.3792 0.3197 0.048 714 601.9 90.3 0.15 77 15.8 15 %
      [EDIT]                      
 
Record count  7         co wogas
c-zeta
c force
c-zeta
ca force
c-zeta
co wogas c force ca force ca% curve gas force drag force ca% calc
id
20
description
took id 17 and 19 and created 5 incremental targets, replacing 17 & 19
spring
4.55
mWheel
85
lev ratio
2.515
from test
3694 Bert Reynolds
target curve name
128_79_38_g
 
application
16 flsprs, 18 shaft, mx18-psh, 10yzf450-psh
 
quick summary comments
5 of 5 increm targ
 
8-23-22 We took id17 (3075) and id19 (3694) and created 4 new incremental targets.
a) id17 (3075) target curve was good, but we had to multiply x 1.27 go get it to align with id19 (3694).
b) We took id17, multiplied cforce by 1.27 and created id22 target, soft.
c) We took id19, changed cforce at 1ips from 32 to 34 and created id21 target, stiff.
d) Then we added those together and divided by 2 to get id22 target, middle.
e) Then we created the 4th stiffer yet target.
For drag force we averaged 30 recent dyno tests with LDPB. This drag was used to create c-zeta numbers.
We used actual dynamic gas force for phm bladder kit, i.e. 75
mx18-psh with ressy pist, gas force = 69c, 73d with 16 flsprs
mx18-psh with bladder kit, gas force = 71c, 75d with 16 flsprs
10yzf450-psh with bladder, gas force = 73c, 77d with 16 flsprs
This curve is based on 'prel ring ls' for s50oval
See vdb / excel / zeta_backwards_shc.xlsx for details
Bert says this shock works very well.
.. 
1 1.2813 0.9948 0.0209 48.3 37.5 0.79 0.021 75 6 2.1 %
2 1.1497 0.9486 0.0284 86.6 71.5 2.14 0.03 75 9 3 %
3 1.0036 0.8398 0.0328 113.4 94.9 3.7 0.039 75 10.8 3.9 %
4 0.8834 0.7412 0.036 133.1 111.6 5.42 0.0485 75 12 4.9 %
5 0.7938 0.6674 0.0387 149.5 125.7 7.29 0.058 75 12.5 5.8 %
10 0.6017 0.5027 0.0523 226.6 189.3 19.68 0.104 75 13.6 10.4 %
20 0.4975 0.4111 0.0617 374.7 309.6 46.45 0.15 75 14.6 15 %
30 0.4374 0.3656 0.0548 494.1 413 61.95 0.15 75 15.1 15 %
40 0.4012 0.3371 0.0506 604.4 507.7 76.15 0.15 76 15.5 15 %
50 0.3793 0.3197 0.048 714.1 602 90.3 0.15 77 15.8 15 %
      [EDIT]                      
 
Record count  7         co wogas
c-zeta
c force
c-zeta
ca force
c-zeta
co wogas c force ca force ca% curve gas force drag force ca% calc
id
16
description
c-zeta based on 3694 trendline
spring
4.7
mWheel
85
lev ratio
2.52
from test
3694 Bert WP converted to National Shock
target curve name
141_77_37_i
 
application
hsca cone, 18 shaft, national-psh10
 
quick summary comments
use this for national shock
 
4-3-22, c-zeta based trendline with levratio 2.52
national-psh10 with ressy pist, gas force = 78c, 82d with hsca cone
We just took WP c-zeta id 14 and changed for 15% ca% and 82d gas
This curve is based on 'prel ring ls' for s50oval
See vdb / excel / zeta_backwards.xlsx for details
See how this works for national shock. 
1 1.4496 0.9204 0.1381 55.6 35.3 5.3 0.15 82 11 15 %
2 1.1584 0.8372 0.1256 88.8 64.2 9.63 0.15 82 11 15 %
3 1.0108 0.7656 0.1148 116.3 88.1 13.21 0.15 82 11 15 %
4 0.9038 0.7009 0.1052 138.6 107.5 16.13 0.15 82 11 15 %
5 0.8165 0.642 0.0963 156.6 123.1 18.46 0.15 82 11 15 %
10 0.6155 0.5012 0.0752 236 192.2 28.83 0.15 82 11 15 %
20 0.483 0.403 0.0605 370.5 309.1 46.38 0.15 82 11 15 %
30 0.4259 0.359 0.0538 489.9 413 61.95 0.15 82 11 15 %
40 0.3917 0.3316 0.0497 600.9 508.6 76.3 0.15 83 11 15 %
50 0.3691 0.3133 0.047 707.8 600.7 90.1 0.15 84 11 15 %
      [EDIT]                      
 
Record count  7         co wogas
c-zeta
c force
c-zeta
ca force
c-zeta
co wogas c force ca force ca% curve gas force drag force ca% calc
id
12
description
c-zeta based on 3423 trendline
spring
4.3
mWheel
85
lev ratio
2.52
from test
3423 Hunter Hargis [10x better than 3416]
target curve name
146_80_37_f
 
application
15 flsprs, 18 shaft, mx18-psh
 
quick summary comments
targets 146 and 109 are very close.
146 is 5% stiffer at 5ips partially from 15flsprs.
- use 109 for 16flsprs and phm bladder.
- use 146 for 15flsprs and stk ressy piston.
..
 
6-24-19, c-zeta based trendline with levratio 2.52
mx18-psh with calc gas force = 69c and 15 flsprs
This curve is based on 'prel ring ls' for s50oval
See vdb / excel / zeta_backwards.xlsx for details
Hunter said this shock 10x better than 3416
.. 
1 1.4594 0.9219 0.0468 53.5 33.8 1.72 0.0483 73 14 5.1 %
2 1.1343 0.8386 0.0504 83.2 61.5 3.7 0.0567 73 14 6 %
3 0.9841 0.767 0.0536 108.3 84.4 5.9 0.0653 73 14 7 %
4 0.8816 0.7022 0.0566 129.3 103 8.31 0.0747 73 14 8.1 %
5 0.7995 0.6434 0.058 146.6 118 10.64 0.0827 73 14 9 %
10 0.6132 0.5021 0.0621 224.9 184.2 22.77 0.11 73 14 12.4 %
20 0.4887 0.4038 0.0604 358.5 296.2 44.28 0.13 73 14 14.9 %
30 0.4298 0.3597 0.0538 473 395.8 59.15 0.13 73 14 14.9 %
40 0.3948 0.3322 0.0497 579.3 487.5 72.85 0.13 74 14 14.9 %
50 0.3717 0.3139 0.0469 681.7 575.7 86.04 0.13 75 14 14.9 %
      [EDIT]